Croteau v. Dearing, 2005 U.S. Dist. Lexis 1948 ( N.D. Ind. February 8, 2005) (Order granting in part and denying in part consumer’s Motion for Summary Judgment and granting consumer’s Motion for Class Certification.)

Rosado v. Taylor, 324 F.Supp.917 (N.D. Ind. 2004) (Ruling that a letter requiring a consumer to dispute an alleged debt in writing violates the FDCPA.)

Campbell v. Hall, 624 F. Supp. 2d 991, 995, 1000-01 (N.D. Ind. 2009) (The Court found that debt collector violated the FDCPA in an initial dunning letter when it imposed a writing requirement to dispute a debt under 15 U.S.C. 1692g.)

Wertz v. Asset Acceptance, LLC, 2014 WL 1133554 (Ind.App. Mar. 21, 2014),(The Court found that a debt buyer who principal place of business was outside of Indiana was not required to comply with the IUCCC’s licensure provision.)

Nance v. Ulferts, 282 F.Supp.2d 912 (N.D. Ind. 2003) (Consumer granted Summary Judgment on his claims under the FDCPA because debt-collecting attorneys attempted to collect an illegal usurious payday loan)

Walters v. PDI Management Services, 2004 U.S. Dist. Lexis 13972 (S.D.Ind. April 6, 2004) (Debt Collector violated the FDCPA when it sent consumer a letter demanding a dispute of an alleged debt to be in writing by certified mail.)